EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL AGENCY ON CORRUPTION PREVENTION IN DETECTING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: ANALYSIS OF STATISTICS FOR 2021-2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32703/2663-6352/2025-1-17-258-264Keywords:
Conflict of interest, corruption prevention, National Agency on Corruption Prevention, authority, administrative offenseAbstract
This academic article is devoted to analyzing the effectiveness of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) in identifying and documenting violations of legal requirements regarding the prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest during the period 2021– 2024. A conflict of interest is examined as one of the key factors contributing to corruption risks, negatively affecting public trust in state and local government institutions. The article explores statistical data on the number of administrative offense protocols filed under Article 172-7 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and identifies key trends, issues, and challenges in law enforcement practices.
The study analyzes the functional powers of the NACP related to monitoring compliance with conflict of interest legislation, including the drafting of protocols and entering data into the Unified State Register of Persons Who Have Committed Corruption or Corruption-Related Offenses. It also examines the division of responsibilities between the NACP and the National Police of Ukraine concerning the identification and documentation of such offenses, depending on the category of public officials involved.
The article emphasizes the importance of timely detection and proper legal documentation of conflicts of interest as a prerequisite for an effective anti-corruption policy. Particular attention is given to problematic aspects of holding individuals accountable for failing to report a conflict of interest and/or acting in situations where a conflict of interest exists. The study concludes that there is a need to strengthen the institutional capacity of the NACP, improve enforcement procedures, and enhance judicial oversight in handling administrative offense cases related to corruption prevention. The findings are essential for further improving conflict of interest prevention mechanisms and ensuring greater transparency and accountability in public administration.