ПОРІВНЯЛЬНИЙ АНАЛІЗ СТАНУ ТА ПЕРСПЕКТИВ РОЗВИТКУ ДЕРЖАВНО-ПРИВАТНОГО ПАРТНЕРСТВА В УКРАЇНІ ТА КРАЇНАХ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ
Keywords:
public-private partnership, law, EU, Ukraine, legislative support, state-owned objects, economic activity, EU law, comparative jurisprudence, privatization, public administrationAbstract
The article considers such a concept as public-private partnership. Public-private partnerships are an example of interaction between government and the private sector. The purpose of such cooperation is to benefit both parties through the implementation of various projects. This paper examines the political and legal aspects of the experience of using public-private partnership mechanisms in the European Union and Ukraine. Speaking of public-private partnership, first of all, we should keep in mind the interaction of the public partner, on the one hand, and the private partner, on the other hand, carried out on the basis of a public-private partnership agreement (PPP), aimed at improving the quality and accessibility of services to the population, as well as attracting private investment in the economy. Public-private partnership is a kind of indicator of how the country has developed relations between business and government. If the country has a developed mechanism of public-private partnership, we can talk about building a kind of relationship on an equal footing. After all, in the framework of this kind of relationship, both rights and responsibilities will have and will be taxed by each of the parties. Both business and government benefit from such cooperation, but at the same time incur some costs. The answer to the difficult economic situation in the state property sector is the generally accepted world practice of publicprivate partnership (PPP), the advantage of which is the involvement of traditionally public sectors of private business practices, as well as the desire to eliminate the shortcomings of both methods of management. responsibilities and risks. The issue of public-private partnership has been long and actively considered by foreign scholars, who have developed a significant methodological basis, which is reflected in the recommendations for public-private partnership of organizations such as the World Bank, International and Asian Banks for Reconstruction and Development, UNCTAD, European Commission, ESC; in the experience of national strategies for the implementation of PPP of developed countries, etc.